Israel killed Ali Larijani in a targeted airstrike in Tehran yesterday. Larijani, 67, was the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the de facto leader of Iran since Khamenei's death on February 28. He was Iran's chief nuclear negotiator in the early 2000s, a former speaker of parliament, and the man Khamenei had designated to hold things together if he died. Netanyahu called Larijani "the boss of the Revolutionary Guards, which is the gang of gangsters that actually runs Iran." Iran's response was immediate: the IRGC launched what it called "intense" retaliatory strikes on Israel, killing at least two people in Ramat Gan. President Pezeshkian vowed to "severely retaliate against all those on whose hands is the blood of innocent but steadfast defenders of Iran." Iran's army commander said Trump "must wait for our surprises."

1. Good Riddance to a War Criminal (Israeli Officials, FDD)

He orchestrated the massacre of tens of thousands of protesters. People think of him as the brain of the Iranian state. His death is a win for the war effort and for justice.

He was the chief architect of the January 2026 crackdown. Tens of thousands of Iranian civilians killed — Iran International verified 6,634 dead, with independent estimates exceeding 36,000 across over 200 cities. The US sanctioned him on January 15 for being among the first Iranian leaders to call for violence against protesters. This wasn't a bureaucrat caught in a strike. This was the man who ordered the Basij to open fire on his own people during Ramadan.

And this is a decapitation of the regime's command structure. Larijani plus Gholamreza Soleimani — the Basij commander killed in a separate strike the same day — means the regime lost both its political coordinator and its chief enforcer in one night. CNN described Larijani as someone who spent decades bridging the security apparatus, the military, and the political establishment. That bridge is gone now.

The rest of the IRGC should be concerned. Larijani was the highest-ranking Iranian official killed since Khamenei's assassination on February 28. Removing the de facto leader and the Basij commander in coordinated strikes demonstrates a level of intelligence penetration that should terrify anyone still in the regime's inner circle.

2. The IRGC Doesn't Need a Brain (Araghchi, Elmasry, IRGC Analysts)

The Guards built a command structure designed to survive exactly this. It's working.

The IRGC is a state-within-a-state, built to outlast any single leader. Each of Iran's 31 provinces has an independent IRGC chain of command. Provincial units can act independently of central command. Every figure in the command structure has named successors spanning three ranks. Iran developed this decentralization after watching Iraqi forces collapse in 2003.

Iran's response proved the point. Within hours of the strike, the IRGC launched retaliatory attacks on Israel and the regime vowed revenge at every level — president, army commander, IRGC leadership. Araghchi's message wasn't grief, it was defiance: we have strong institutions, no single person's death changes the structure. The speed of the retaliation suggests the decentralized command worked exactly as designed.

This is a game of Whac-A-Mole. The US and Israel keep targeting Iranian leaders, and there's always another one ready to step in. Decapitation strikes rarely produce decisive political outcomes in systems like Iran's — they remove individuals but leave the underlying structure intact. Don't expect regime collapse, at least not based on this.

3. And Actually, This May Work Against Peace (CBS Analysts, CNN, Middle East Eye)

Larijani wasn't just running the war. He was quietly trying to end it. Now nobody is.

Larijani had reportedly been involved in quiet efforts to reopen channels with Washington. Even as the war escalated, he was one of the few figures in the regime with the credibility and the contacts to explore a diplomatic off-ramp. His background as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator in the early 2000s made him the rare insider who knew how to talk to the other side.

His removal could prolong the war. Eliminating a moderating force hardens the narrative inside Tehran that this is an existential fight to destroy the leadership itself. When the people capable of negotiating are the same people getting killed, the incentive structure shifts: why negotiate if it just makes you a target?

And there's no one else, at least not obviously. Middle East Eye described him as irreplaceable — he bridged every faction, IRGC, political establishment, intelligence services. And he was among a handful of people who could manage both the war and the politics around it. Without him, the regime loses the capacity to pivot. The IRGC can keep fighting, but fighting is all it knows how to do.

4. No Matter What, This Assassination Shows Israel & the US Have An Equal Alliance (Bret Stephens, NYT)

Israel carried out 7,600 strikes. The US carried out 7,000. This isn't the tail wagging the dog.

Bret Stephens of the NYT argues the Larijani kill proves this is a war WITH Israel, not FOR it. Israel has carried out roughly 7,600 strikes. The US has struck over 7,000 targets, per CENTCOM. This may be the first time since World War II that Washington has had a military partner carrying an equal share of the burden. When Israel took out Larijani, it was making a contribution no other US ally could.

The "war for Israel" charge echoes old antisemitic patterns. Stephens traces it back to Patrick Buchanan in 1990, who named specific Jewish commentators as the only people who wanted war with Iraq. The same charge surfaced during the 2003 Iraq war. Now Joe Kent's resignation letter makes the identical claim about Iran. Stephens' counterpoint: Kamala Harris called Iran America's greatest adversary in October 2024 — was she also just doing Netanyahu's bidding?

The Larijani kill is the proof of concept. Israel identified and eliminated Iran's de facto leader and the Basij commander in coordinated strikes, demonstrating military and intelligence capability no other US ally — not Britain, not France, not Germany — could match. Stephens' framing: the real story isn't whether this war benefits Israel, it's that for once, America has an ally that pulls its weight.

Where This Lands

Larijani's death pulls in four directions at once. He was a war criminal who oversaw the massacre of tens of thousands of his own people — and his death is a legitimate win for the US-Israeli campaign. But the IRGC was built to survive exactly this, with 20 years of decentralized command planning, and Mojtaba Khamenei is already functioning as a figurehead while the Guards run the war. The darkest angle is that Larijani may have been the last person in the regime capable of negotiating a way out — and killing your enemy's diplomat doesn't end a war. Where this lands depends on whether the next few weeks reveal a regime fracturing without its bridge-builder, a military machine that barely noticed he was gone, or a war that just lost its only off-ramp.

Sources