On February 28, a US airstrike destroyed Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' elementary school in Minab, Iran, killing at least 165 people — most of them girls aged 7 to 12. NPR published a video appearing to show a Tomahawk cruise missile hitting the compound. The school was within 100 yards of an IRGC Naval base, but had been physically walled off from it since at least 2013-2016, per NPR's satellite imagery analysis. Al Jazeera's investigation found the school had been "clearly separated from the adjacent military site for at least ten years." A preliminary US intelligence assessment says the US "likely" hit the school due to "dated intelligence which wrongly identified the area as still part of an Iranian military installation." Trump told reporters: "Based on what I've seen, that was done by Iran." A lingering issue is what role AI played in the strikes.

1. A Tragic Error in a Complex Operation (Pentagon, Pete Hegseth)

The US did not intentionally target a school.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was categorical. "We, of course, never target civilian targets." DoD and IDF spokespeople told Time and the AP they were "unaware that a school had been hit."

US military investigators confirmed the "likely" attribution but stressed it was unintentional. The preliminary assessment points to outdated intelligence — the school appears to have remained in a target database after being physically separated from the adjacent IRGC base. The investigation is ongoing.

The proximity complicates the picture. The school was within 100 yards of a military installation. In a complex multi-site opening strike against a country's military infrastructure, distinguishing civilian from military structures at that distance — especially with stale targeting data — is exactly the kind of failure that happens in war. The question is whether the targeting process was reckless, not whether it was malicious.

2. Investigate This as a War Crime (Human Rights Watch, UNESCO, Malala Yousafzai)

Whether intentional or not, triple-tapping a school full of children demands accountability.

Human Rights Watch called for the attack to be investigated as a war crime. UNESCO condemned it as "a grave violation of humanitarian law." Malala Yousafzai said the killing of children is "unconscionable," adding the girls "went to school to learn, with hopes and dreams for their future."

The "outdated intelligence" defense doesn't hold. Al Jazeera found the school had been separated from the base for at least ten years. NPR confirmed this with Planet Labs satellite imagery dating back to 2013-2016. Google Earth would have shown the same thing. If freely available commercial satellite data shows a school, the world's most expensive military should have known.

The school was reportedly hit by three missiles. That's not a stray round. That's a deliberate, repeated strike on a single target. The pattern of fire — three impacts on one compound during school hours — is what demands an independent investigation.

3. AI Killed These Children (Will Bunch, EJIL Talk, AI safety researchers)

The targeting system has a name. The failure mode has a name. The children have names.

AI targeting systems were confirmed in use for "hundreds" of targets in the first wave of strikes. Palantir Maven, using Claude AI, was part of the targeting pipeline. Independent AI testing professionals told press outlets that the likely failure was "temporal label persistence" — a known failure mode where outdated classifications persist in AI systems.

Will Bunch called it "a permanent stain on America's soul." EJIL Talk published analysis on the accountability gaps created when AI systems participate in targeting decisions. Common Dreams reported that Israel used AI to pick Iran targets "without any human oversight" — paralleling its use of AI targeting systems in Gaza.

The question isn't whether the US meant to hit a school. The question is whether automated targeting systems should be deciding who lives and dies when their failure modes have known names and known consequences. "Temporal label persistence" sounds clinical until you count the bodies.

4. Iran Did It (Trump, pro-war MAGA)

Trump denied US responsibility. His most extreme supporters went further.

Trump was blunt. "Based on what I've seen, that was done by Iran. It was Iran who did it." This contradicts the US military's own preliminary assessment.

A MAGA lobbyist said the schoolgirls were "better off dead than in a burqa." The comment captured the most extreme version of the pro-war argument: that the regime's treatment of women is so bad that civilian casualties are acceptable, even children.

The antiwar MAGA wing is even more against Trump now. Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly railed against the joint military operation with Israel. The school strike deepened a split that was already tearing through Trump's base.

Where This Lands

The evidence is converging: US military investigators, NPR, the Washington Post, CBC, and the New York Times all point to the US as "likely" responsible. Trump says Iran did it. HRW wants a war crime investigation. AI safety researchers say the targeting system had to fail at some point — it's endemic to the design. The 165 children who went to school that morning are at the center of a fight about whether "intelligence failure" is an explanation or an excuse — and whether the machines we trust to pick targets can tell a school from a military base when the satellite images have shown the difference for a decade.

Sources