Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to Lululemon today, probing whether the company misled consumers about PFAS — "forever chemicals" — in its activewear. PFAS are synthetic chemicals used for water-repellent and stain-resistant coatings that don't break down in the body or environment. Lululemon says it phased out PFAS in fiscal year 2023 and doesn't currently use them. Shares dropped 4.5% on the news, extending a decline of more than 20% this year.

1. This Is A Serious Health Risk (Consumer Advocates, EWG)

PFAS cause cancer, infertility, and liver disease — and they were in your yoga pants while you sweated.

PFAs are super bad. Research links PFAS exposure to cancer, endocrine disruption, infertility, liver and kidney disease, weakened immune function, and developmental problems in children. The EPA has confirmed the health dangers. These aren't theoretical risks — they're the reason states are banning the chemicals outright. PFAS were used in activewear specifically for moisture-wicking and stain resistance, the features Lululemon markets as premium.

And they're made worse for you during exercise. During exercise, heat and friction amplify chemical absorption through the skin while pores are open. EWG testing found fluorine — an indicator of PFAS — in activewear from multiple brands, with levels up to 284 parts per million. New York's ban on PFAS in garments took effect in 2025; California's followed the same year; Maine's kicks in this year. The regulatory direction is clear — these chemicals don't belong in clothing.

2. We Already Fixed This (Lululemon)

We phased out PFAS two years ago. This investigation is looking for a problem that no longer exists.

Lululemon says it does not use PFAS in its products and phased out the substance in fiscal year 2023. The company specified that PFAS had only been used in "durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment" — not across the full line. Lululemon said it's cooperating with the investigation and providing all requested documentation.

The company requires all vendors to conduct regular testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, through credible third-party agencies. Multiple major brands have made similar phase-out commitments — L.L. Bean, American Eagle, Patagonia, REI, and PVH Corp have all moved to eliminate PFAS. Lululemon's argument is that it was ahead of federal requirements and proactive about the transition. The alternatives already exist: water-based finishes, silicone-based coatings, and natural fiber engineering.

3. Paxton Has An Agenda Here (Political/Regulatory Skeptics)

This is the same AG who sued 3M and DuPont. PFAS is his consumer protection franchise.

Paxton sued 3M and DuPont in late 2024 for misrepresenting the safety of PFAS in Teflon, Stainmaster, and Scotchgard. That litigation alleged the companies knew about environmental and biological risks and continued marketing the products as safe. The Lululemon probe follows the same theory — consumer deception claims built on PFAS health science.

The CID's scope suggests this isn't a routine compliance check. It compels Lululemon to produce supply chain practices, chemical management policies, and the full restricted substances list — not just current labels. If Lululemon genuinely phased out PFAS in 2023, the CID may find compliant documentation and nothing more. But the breadth of the demand mirrors what powered the 3M and DuPont suits: evidence of what companies knew and when they knew it.

Where This Lands

Lululemon says the problem is solved — PFAS were phased out two years ago, vendors are tested, and the company is cooperating. Health advocates say two decades of selling forever chemicals in premium activewear doesn't end with a quiet phase-out announcement. And Paxton is building a track record of PFAS enforcement that suggests he's not asking Lululemon to produce documents for fun.

Sources