Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, was booed throughout his commencement address at the University of Arizona on Friday, May 15. The boos started before he reached the stage and intensified when he turned to AI. A petition with more than 1,260 student signatures had asked the university to cancel the speech and rescind Schmidt's honorary degree — and the named organizers said it was about a November 2025 sexual assault lawsuit, not the AI talk. Most national coverage led with the AI issue.

1. Students Were Right About AI (Brian Merchant, student organizers)

AI optimism reads as gaslighting when entry-level jobs are evaporating in real time and the billionaire on stage has publicly said your fears are "overstated."

Telling 22-year-olds to "shape AI" while their entry-level jobs disappear is not motivation, it is denial. The line that drew the loudest second wave of boos: "The question is not whether AI will shape the world. It will. The question is whether you will have shaped artificial intelligence." Schmidt has previously said on the record that AI job-loss concerns are "overstated" and that "data points to a worker shortage." The audience knew. The Gallup numbers tell their version of the story: only 43% of Americans aged 15-34 say it is a good time to find a local job — 21 points below the over-55 cohort.

The booing is a labor-market signal, not a rejection of technology. Brian Merchant, author of "Blood in the Machine," wrote that "I too would loudly boo at the prospect of this next industrial revolution if I was in my early twenties, unemployed, and had aspirations for my future greater than entering prompts into an LLM." He called the current wave "the cruel new face of hyper-scaling capitalism." The week before Schmidt's speech, Gloria Caulfield was drowned out at the University of Central Florida for calling AI "the next industrial revolution." Graduates chanted "AI SUCKS!" This is now a pattern.

2. Most Coverage Got the Boos Wrong (Women and Gender Student Council, FORCE)

The petition was about a sexual assault lawsuit, not about AI. National press flipped that.

The first organized opposition started weeks before anyone heard the AI line. FORCE (Feminists Organized to Resist, Create and Empower), Students for Socialism, the Women and Gender Resource Center, Pride Alliance, and the Women and Gender Student Council circulated a petition asking the university to cancel the speech and rescind the honorary degree. It had over 1,260 signatures by mid-May. Their grievance, in writing: "Someone who does this should not be honored for his 'contributions' to science." The flyers distributed at the ceremony told attendees to "turn their backs to the stage" or boo.

The "this" was the Ritter lawsuit, not the speech. Schmidt's former partner Michelle Ritter filed a November 2025 lawsuit alleging he forcibly raped her on a yacht off Mexico in 2021, initiated sex without consent at Burning Man 2023, and built a "backdoor" into Google to surveil her. Schmidt's attorney Patricia Glaser called the claims "false and defamatory... a desperate and destructive effort to publish false and defamatory statements to escape accountability from an existing arbitration over a business dispute." The boos at the stadium and the petition in the dorms came from different rooms responding to the same invitation, and the press blurred them into one.

3. He Was Telling Them the Truth (University of Arizona, Jensen Huang contrast)

A speech can be unwelcome and still be accurate. The world AI is reshaping is the one these graduates have to live in.

A billionaire who funds your university's telescope is going to give a commencement speech about AI; that is not breaking news. University spokesperson Mitch Zak's defense: "We invited Eric Schmidt to deliver the commencement address in recognition of his extraordinary leadership and global contributions in technology, innovation and scientific advancement." President Suresh Garimella called him "a leading architect in the era of artificial intelligence." The school specifically cited the Lazuli space telescope — a 3-meter mirror exoplanet instrument funded by Schmidt Sciences, with key instruments built at the University of Arizona — as part of the partnership Schmidt represents. The university's position: he funded the science, and the science is good.

The framing matters, but the message is the same. Five days before Schmidt's speech, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang gave the commencement address at Carnegie Mellon and was not booed. Huang told graduates "AI is not likely to replace you" and "Run. Don't walk" toward AI. Different audience (engineering), different framing (agency, empowerment), same underlying claim about AI's role. Schmidt, to his credit, acknowledged the same point his audience was making. Of Google's legacy, he said: "We thought that we were adding stones to a cathedral of knowledge that humanity had been constructing for centuries, but the world we built turned out to be more complicated than we anticipated." He called the students' fears "rational." They booed anyway.

Where This Lands

The honest read is that two disagreements happened in the same room. One was about whether AI optimism, delivered by a billionaire who has called job-loss fears "overstated," is acceptable to a generation watching the entry-level rungs of the labor ladder disappear. The other was about whether a university should give an honorary doctorate to a man currently facing a rape allegation, which he denies. National coverage mostly told the first story. The students who started the petition told the second.

Sources