Trump signed an executive order banning DEI across the federal government on January 21, 2025. That same month, Meta eliminated its entire DEI team. Walmart dropped the term, canceled its $100 million commitment to the Center for Racial Equity, and stopped participating in Human Rights Campaign surveys. Amazon, McDonald's, Target, Ford, and Toyota followed. The corporate dominoes fell fast. But Costco shareholders voted 98% to keep DEI. Apple's voted 97.3%. And average investor support for anti-DEI proposals? Less than 2%.

1. Good Riddance (Christopher Rufo, Heather Mac Donald, SFFA Majority)

DEI replaced merit with identity. It told people their race was more important than their work. That's not justice -- it's discrimination with better branding.

Christopher Rufo's argument is that DEI isn't about diversity -- it's about ideology. The Manhattan Institute senior fellow was crucial to the banning of several DEI programs. His framing: DEI programs institutionalize racial preferences under the guise of inclusion, and dismantling them restores what he calls colorblind equality. The question isn't whether workplaces should be diverse. It's whether race-conscious policies are the right way to get there. Rufo's answer is that they violate the principle that people should be judged as individuals, not as members of demographic categories.

The recipients of DEI are themselves harmed. DEI hiring creates a two-tier system where standards are quietly lowered for some candidates and everyone knows it. This undermines the very people it claims to help, because colleagues assume diverse hires didn't earn their positions. The Supreme Court echoed this in banning affirmative action in schools: race-conscious admissions "stamp" applicants with a racial identity that determines their worth, reducing individuals to "the color of their skin."

It just doesn't work the way it's supposed to. The Harvard Business Review declared DEI a failure before it was canceled: a 2022 HBR piece described a "DEI industrial complex" in which an uncomfortably large proportion of DEI initiatives simply fail. This was across all types of initiatives: unconscious bias training, racial sensitivity workshops, the business case pitch, resume anonymization. A 400-study meta-analysis found little evidence that diversity instruction reduces prejudice -- and whatever stereotypes disappear after a workshop typically re-emerge weeks or months later.

2. It Works When Done Right -- and We Still Need It (Costco, Apple, Civil Rights Groups)

The equity gaps DEI was designed to address haven't closed. Walking away from it doesn't make them disappear.

Costco and Apple shareholders see DEI as a business advantage, not a liability. When activist proposals demanded Costco evaluate the "financial risks" of its DEI goals, 98% of shareholders voted them down. Costco's board said a diverse workforce brings originality and creativity to its offerings. Apple's vote was nearly identical: 97.3% rejection. Levi's, John Deere, and Goldman Sachs shareholders followed suit. The market, when asked directly, keeps choosing DEI.

Companies that dropped DEI are paying a price. Fortune reported that firms rolling back diversity programs see lower retention of underrepresented staff, fewer women and people of color in leadership pipelines, and declining morale. Target's DEI retreat correlated with drops in employee satisfaction and weaker sales. The backlash was supposed to be good business. For some companies, it's been the opposite.

We're now moving backwards. Women on S&P 500 boards went from 27% to 34% between 2020 and 2024 -- real progress, built by the programs now being dismantled. And new Black directors on Russell 3000 boards fell from 26% to 12% of appointments as the backlash took hold. Pay gaps persist. The structural inequalities that DEI was designed to address didn't vanish because the term got unpopular.

3. It Was Never Real (HBR, Spectra Diversity)

Corporate DEI was a branding exercise. The left told you this years ago.

The numbers prove corporate American didn't do much. Back in its heyday, seventy percent of companies claimed DEI was critical to their business -- but only 25% formally adopted DEI policies. Eighty-four percent of leadership believed their organization was actively investing in DEI -- but only 31% of employees agreed. US organizations pledged $60 billion on racial equity initiatives after George Floyd's murder. One year later, only $250 million had been committed to specific initiatives. That's 0.4%.

The rollbacks aren't a betrayal -- they're a reveal. When companies drop DEI the moment political winds shift, it confirms what critics on the left always said: it was marketing. DEI became a corporate tool for reputation management, not workplace equity. The real question isn't whether DEI failed. It's whether it was ever tried.

4. It's Complicated (Frank Dobbin, Green & Hand)

Some DEI programs work. Most don't. And the most-cited study supporting them might be wrong.

There are things that work -- but most of what's out there doesn't. Research across 829 firms found that traditional diversity tools -- training, hiring tests, performance ratings -- are largely ineffective. What works: targeted college recruitment, mentoring programs, self-managed teams, social accountability, and transparency. Structure beats forced education. But the programs that work are the ones companies are least likely to adopt -- because they require transparency, not training budgets.

And the gains may create their own trap. Research shows that once teams achieve visible gender balance, managers stop scrutinizing pay and promotion decisions -- a diversity paradox where the appearance of progress kills the effort to achieve it. And board representation hasn't closed pay gaps. The data doesn't say DEI is useless. It says the version most companies practiced was useless, and the version that works is hard.

Where This Lands

The honest answer is that DEI was too many things to succeed or fail as a single thing. We do know that the corporate version -- the pledge drives, the unconscious bias workshops, the chief diversity officers hired in 2020 and laid off in 2024 -- was mostly performance or useless. But there may be structural interventions -- transparent pay data, mentoring programs, accountability systems -- that work, and work measurably. The backlash erased both kinds without distinguishing between them. Where this lands depends on whether companies can separate what worked from what was theater -- and whether the political climate will allow it.

Sources: