President Trump announced Sunday that the U.S. military would begin "guiding" ships through the Strait of Hormuz starting Monday, an operation called Project Freedom. U.S. Central Command is sending guided-missile destroyers, more than 100 aircraft, drones, and 15,000 service members. The strait has been effectively closed since March 2, after Iran's IRGC threatened any vessel that tried to pass. Daily transits collapsed from about 130 to 6. A ship was attacked near the strait the same day Trump made the announcement.
1. The Strait Has To Stay Open (The White House, CENTCOM)
The world's most important shipping chokepoint cannot stay shut, and the U.S. Navy is the only force in a position to reopen it.
A waterway that moves about 20% of the world's oil cannot be left to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Roughly 20 million barrels per day — about a fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption and a fifth of global LNG trade — move through Hormuz in normal times. Trump framed Project Freedom as a humanitarian gesture, saying countries "not involved" in the war had asked for help and that the U.S. would "guide their Ships safely out of these restricted Waterways." CENTCOM described the May 4 launch as restoring "freedom of navigation for commercial shipping."
They have the firepower. Guided-missile destroyers, more than 100 aircraft, multi-domain unmanned platforms, and 15,000 personnel are now committed to the operation. Two U.S. warships had already transited the strait on April 11 to scout a new route for merchant ships, a precursor that proved the lanes can be opened with American hardware on station.
The US has done this before. During the 1987-88 Tanker War, the U.S. reflagged about a dozen Kuwaiti tankers as American vessels and ran convoys for them through the same waters, escorting 259 ships in all under Operation Earnest Will — the largest naval convoy operation since World War II. The mission did have real costs: the Bridgeton hit a mine on the first run, USS Stark lost 37 sailors to an Iraqi missile, and the U.S. shot down Iran Air Flight 655, killing 290. But the strait stayed open. Qatar publicly reinforced the principle this week, calling freedom of navigation "well-established and non-negotiable."
2. This Is The War Congress Never Voted For (Sen. Tim Kaine, war-powers critics)
Calling the war "terminated" while sending destroyers and 15,000 troops into a hostile waterway is a War Powers Act violation in plain sight.
The hostilities have not ended just because the White House sent a letter saying so. The administration recently told congressional leaders that hostilities with Iran "have terminated," skirting the 60-day War Powers clock. Trump went further and suggested the War Powers Act itself is unconstitutional.
A naval blockade of another country's ports is an act of war by any standard definition. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), lead sponsor of the Iran war powers resolution, put it this way: "The military operations haven't stopped. We're still using the U.S. military to blockade all Iranian ports, which is an act of war. Our troops are on orders to be in combat." The U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports has been continuous since April 13, alongside Project Freedom, not in place of it.
The America First wing is making the same point from the right. Tucker Carlson called the original Iran operation "absolutely disgusting and evil." Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) wrote that the war "is not 'America First'" and worked with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) to force a House floor vote. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said: "We voted for America First and ZERO wars." Project Freedom expands the U.S. footprint at the exact moment Congress was supposed to be deciding whether the footprint should exist at all.
3. Touch Our Water And The Truce Is Done (Iran)
Tehran has been clear about this: any American move into the strait is a breach of the ceasefire, and the strait is not going back to what it was before the war.
Iran considers Project Freedom a treaty violation, not a humanitarian mission. Ebrahim Azizi, head of Iran's parliamentary National Security Commission, warned that any "American interference" in the strait would be considered a breach of the ceasefire that took effect April 7. Ali Nikzad, Iran's deputy parliament speaker, was blunter: "What is certain is that we will not step back from the Strait of Hormuz, and it will not return to its pre-war state."
The ceasefire is being held together by both sides pretending the other is bluffing. Yousef Pezeshkian, son and adviser of President Masoud Pezeshkian, wrote on Telegram that both Washington and Tehran see themselves as winners and refuse to back down. Tehran's open peace offer — a 14-point proposal — demands the U.S. lift sanctions, end the naval blockade of Iranian ports, withdraw forces from the region, and stop Israeli operations in Lebanon. Project Freedom moves in the opposite direction on every line.
The practical risk is that the U.S. is now putting destroyers and helicopters into a waterway Iran has not actually agreed to share. Senior fellow Negar Mortazavi has noted the operation will not be read in Tehran as humanitarian, and that it brings U.S. forces "closer to the shooting range of Iran" if it becomes a true escort. The Iranian sea mines that prompted the U.S. lane-guidance plan in the first place are still in the water. The first incident — a misread radar contact, a stray mine, a small-boat probe — ends the truce.
4. It's Mostly Just A Press Release (Shipping industry, BIMCO)
The U.S. isn't actually convoying anyone. There aren't enough warships to do it, and the people who run the ships have already decided not to sail.
Project Freedom is "guiding," not escorting — and the distinction matters. A U.S. official told reporters the Navy will be "in the vicinity" rather than directly convoying commercial ships, and will mainly provide information on safe lanes that haven't been mined. That's a far smaller commitment than what the headline implies, and far smaller than Earnest Will, where warships physically led tankers through.
The math doesn't work for a real escort. Roughly 100 tankers a day move through Hormuz in normal times, with overall ship traffic of about 130 a day. BIMCO Chief Safety & Security Officer Jakob Larsen acknowledged escorts would help the protected ships, then said the obvious: "providing protection for all tankers operating in areas currently threatened by Iran is unrealistic as this would require a very high number of warships and other military assets." Daily traffic has already collapsed by about 95%. Shipping companies have said they want a stable ceasefire and assurances from both sides before they sail again.
The Gulf is working on alternatives. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, and Bahrain agreed at a recent GCC summit to fast-track a regional rail network linking the six states, with the goal of diverting a meaningful share of exports away from Hormuz via Red Sea or land routes. The countries that depend on the strait the most are quietly planning to need it less. That is not the behavior of an industry that thinks Project Freedom solves the problem.
Where This Lands
The maximalist case for Project Freedom is real — the strait genuinely cannot stay closed indefinitely without dragging the global economy with it, and the U.S. Navy is the only force that can credibly reopen it. But the case against is also real: the operation expands a war Congress never authorized, Iran has labeled it a treaty breach, and the shipping industry is openly skeptical that "guidance in the vicinity" actually moves ships.
Sources
- Axios: Trump says U.S. Navy will escort ships out of the Strait of Hormuz from Monday
- The National: 'Project Freedom': US military will begin escorting ships through Strait of Hormuz
- Fortune: Trump says US will guide stranded ships from 'neutral and innocent' countries
- Fortune: Markets on alert as Trump vows 'Project Freedom' for Hormuz
- Al Jazeera: Trump says US will 'help free up' ships stuck in Hormuz Strait
- Al Jazeera live blog: Iran war updates: Trump announces plan to escort ships in Hormuz Strait
- NPR: Sen. Tim Kaine on Trump's timeline to end Iran war and efforts to limit war powers
- The Hill: Trump questions War Powers Act constitutionality as Iran conflict hits 60 days
- ship.energy: More details needed on U.S. protection proposals in Hormuz, says BIMCO
- IDNFinancials: Industry doubts U.S. Navy tanker escorts in the Strait of Hormuz
- USNI News: Operation Epic Escort: Pentagon Weighs Options on Strait of Hormuz Transits
- USNI News: Two U.S. Warships Sail Through Strait of Hormuz to Establish New Route for Merchant Ships
- Wikipedia: 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis
- Wikipedia: Operation Earnest Will
- Military.com: The US Protected Ships from Iran in the Strait of Hormuz in the '80s. Could It Again?
- UNCTAD: Strait of Hormuz disruptions: Implications for global trade and development
- U.S. Energy Information Administration: Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint
- U.S. Energy Information Administration: About one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade flows through the Strait of Hormuz
- Daily Caller: 'Not What We Thought MAGA Was Supposed To Be': America First Skeptics Blast Iran Strikes
- Gulf News: Trump Launches 'Project Freedom' as Iran reviews 14-point proposal
- The Conversation: What alternatives do Gulf states have to the Strait of Hormuz?
- UN Security Council: Immediately Restore Freedom of Navigation through Strait of Hormuz