Iran's Judiciary hanged four protesters on Sunday, May 3. Mehrab Abdollahzadeh (28), a Kurdish "Woman, Life, Freedom" protester from the 2022 wave, was executed in Urmia. Mohammad Reza Miri (21), Mehdi Rasouli (25), and Ebrahim Dowlatabadi — a father of two — were executed in Mashhad. The judiciary said they were "leading and directing rioters" during the December 2025-January 2026 uprisings. These protests saw at least 7,000 killed and 50,000 arrested. And since March 19, Iran has carried out 26 political executions, roughly one every 48 hours.

1. The 1988 Playbook Is Back (IHRNGO, Amiry-Moghaddam, UN)

Iran's last regime-saving wave of executions killed thousands. Human rights groups say the 2026 wave is following the same script.

The pattern matches 1988. Iran Human Rights director Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam said the recent killings of protesters are "reminiscent of the regime's crimes in the 1980s, which have been recognised as crimes against humanity." The 1988 mass executions of Iranian political prisoners killed an estimated 2,800 to 5,000 people in a few months. The current pattern — fast-tracked verdicts, no due process, public hangings — is the same. Amiry-Moghaddam: "The international community must take these threats extremely seriously, because officials of the Islamic Republic committed similar crimes in the 1980s in order to hold onto power."

The courts are moving faster than ever. Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje'i has explicitly told televised meetings of senior judiciary officials to "speed up" sentences, and that the "normal routine" should no longer govern legal cases. Investigations that previously took 10 days are being finalized within hours. Mohseni-Eje'i served on the Interim Leadership Council that ran Iran for a week after Khamenei's assassination, and remains Chief Justice today. 26 political executions since March 19, four in a single day on May 3. The UN Special Rapporteur on Iran has warned that executions have surged since the US-Israeli war began February 28 and that political prisoners face "expedited" executions.

2. The Regime Says These Were Criminal Rioters (Iran's official line)

Iran's judiciary is not denying the executions. It is saying the men were violent leaders who killed Basij forces.

The judiciary's charges are specific, not vague. Miri and Rasouli were accused of having a "direct role" in killing Basij member Hamidreza Yousefinejad during the December 2025-January 2026 uprisings. Dowlatabadi was labeled a "main leader of unrest in Mashhad's Tabarsi district." The state framing is that these were not peaceful demonstrators but armed insurrectionists who killed regime forces.

The war gave the regime legal cover. The Tehran regime has accused its opponents — including the December 2025 protesters — of working for U.S. or Israeli intelligence, often without further evidence. With the country at war from February 28 to the April 7 ceasefire, "spying for Israel" became the easiest charge to stack on a protest case. The fast-track process under Mohseni-Eje'i did the rest.

And they're using forced confessions. Rights groups document that protesters are being sentenced to death following grossly unfair, fast-tracked trials conducted without due process or independent counsel, with reliance on torture-tainted forced "confessions" as evidence. Abdollahzadeh, executed in Urmia, was reported by rights groups to have been subjected to physical and psychological torture to extract a confession. The regime's "specific charges" rest on testimony the regime extracted under duress.

3. Meanwhile, Trump Keeps Saying The War Is Over (the diplomatic pickle)

The US is the one country Iran might respond to, and the Trump administration has spent the last month telling Congress the Iran war is over. Saying it loudly now is hard.

Trump tried to say he saved Iranian lives before; Iran denied it. Trump said Iran had spared 800 prisoners from execution at his request. Iran's top prosecutor called it "false news." The episode left the U.S. with no public lever it can use again without Iran calling another bluff.

Past warnings have been ignored. Earlier in 2026, the Mojtaba Khamenei regime executed 19-year-old champion wrestler Saleh Mohammadi over State Department warnings and pleas from Iranian-American wrestlers. The U.S. doesn't have a credible track record on stopping a single political execution this year, let alone four in a day.

Calling the war "terminated" has a cost. The White House recently told Congress that hostilities with Iran "have terminated," skirting the 60-day War Powers clock. That framing means the U.S. has rhetorically put away the leverage it just spent six weeks of bombing to acquire. The hangings happen now, with no follow-up consequence the administration is willing to threaten.

4. This Isn't America's Tragedy To Fix (Carlson, Greenwald, Vance, the restraint camp)

Iran's executions are real. So was the war we just got out of. The argument is that the outrage is being weaponized to pull the U.S. back in.

Iran's domestic crackdown is its own moral tragedy but not American foreign policy. Tucker Carlson has spent the last six weeks arguing the Iran war was the "end of American empire," and his May NYT interview broke with Trump explicitly over Iran. His core line is that the United States ran out of moral standing and strategic capacity to police other countries' domestic politics decades ago. The executions are awful; the U.S. is not the country that's going to fix them.

This is actually propaganda, even though true and horrible. Glenn Greenwald has argued on his Substack and on Carlson's show that American media coverage of Iran's executions is functioning as Iraq-War-style propaganda — the moral case constructed to justify continued U.S. involvement in the war. His framing is that the regime's behavior is awful and also exactly what every regime under existential pressure has done. The selective American outrage about it is the tell.

Even inside the Trump administration, the war had loud opposition from the start. JD Vance was the only one in Trump's inner circle to argue against the Iran war. He and people like him think the U.S. should treat Iran as a problem to manage, not solve. The executions don't change that view — they reinforce it. The U.S. cannot bomb its way to better Iranian human rights.

Where This Lands

26 executions in six weeks, four in a day, "one every 48 hours" — the human rights groups' read is that Iran is bringing back its 1988 playbook. The regime's read is that these men killed Basij members during an uprising and that the charges are specific. The diplomatic read is that the U.S. has written down its leverage by calling the war over. The alt-MAGA/nationalist read is that we can't solve another country's problems, full stop.

Sources